FAQ

Any prospective successor, including Paras, would operate within the parameters of the existing constitutional framework, which serves to effectively limit the scope of political power and authority. It is noteworthy that Paras has publicly articulated his intention not to pursue the title of king, thus alleviating any ambiguity regarding the future of the monarchy and the line of succession. In this framework, the monarchy retains its role as a significant symbol of national unity and cultural heritage, while functioning without the exercise of absolute power or authority. This arrangement reinforces the principles of democracy and governance, ensuring that the monarchy acts primarily as a unifying figurehead in the service of the nation’s collective interests.

Rajabadi (राजाबादी) – Royalist: Pro-King People who personally support the King himself, his rule, power, and leadership. They believe the King should directly lead or have authority in running the country. It’s more about loyalty to the person of the King. Rajsansthabadi (राजसंस्थाबादी) – Means: Pro-Monarchy System People who support the institution of monarchy, not necessarily the King as an individual. They believe the Royal Institution should exist as a symbol of unity, stability, and tradition, even if the King has limited (ceremonial) powers. Rajabadi: King should run the country. Rajsansthabadi: Keep the monarchy, but democracy runs the country.

The Crown embodies a transcendence through tireless service to the nation, not the outdated claim of feudal control. The monarch operates as a symbolic institution, performing their solemn duties for the people, never wielding the unchecked power of a ruler.

In constitutional monarchy, the sovereign’s powers are strictly limited by the constitution. It isn’t just about an individual ruler; it’s an institution that embodies the nation’s moral values and traditions. The monarch cannot rule unilaterally; any abuse of power is prevented by constitutional checks and balances, ensuring strong protection against dictatorship from the Crown, the judiciary, and parliament.

Following three decades of political turbulence, Nepal, positioned in a critical geopolitical scenario between two major superpower, has been unable to find stability through its elected representatives and political parties. Consequently, the monarchy emerges as a definitive alternative for political stability, precisely because it stands above partisan friction and remains dedicated solely to the people of Nepal.

Hinduism, Buddhism, and Kirat are the oldest religions and are still the top three religion practiced in our country. Since the existence of Nepal, monarchs have historically served as the ultimate cultural custodians, a tradition that would continue under a constitutional monarchy. This role guarantees not only religious freedom and tolerance for all citizens under the law, but also actively prevents the discrimination or underrepresentation. The crown would be the impartial guarantor of the nation’s multi-faith unity.

Nepal, the nation historically unified from thousands of diverse sub-kingdoms, is currently facing internal division and political instability, which furthermore demands the reinstatement of monarchy. Given Nepal’s geopolitical position between two major powers, the head of the state must be an institution that is just, constitutitional and worthy. Furthermore, the directly elected prime minister demands monarch as the head of the state, it cannot survive under President. Monarch is the oldest and the most respected institution. The head of the Executive, today, do not worry about the nation, they worry about their tenure because as long as the Parliament can make or break the government, it cannot function to it’s full potential. Key decisions made under Nepal’s current system-such as the ratification of the MCC and the passing of the Citizenship Act-have repeatedly placed the nation’s sovereignty in jeopardy. In addition, during the republic era, Nepal witnessed 15 Prime Ministers over the course of 17 years which pretty much explains why federal democratic replublic is a failure.

King Gyanendra represents the historical continuity of the Shah dynasty. The constitutional monarchy ensures his role to be ceremonial, focused on fostering national unity, upholding tradition, and providing moral guidance, while remaining above direct political disputes. The crown will be committed to the constitution of Nepal, that shall aim to protect national interests and pride while ensuring stability and safeguarding the rights of all citizens without any bias towards self-interest. With a proven track record in managing national interests and engaging in foreign diplomacy, alongside strong geopolitical connections, His Majesty stands as a highly qualified candidate for this esteemed role. His candidacy is further bolstered by his extensive experience and his vital contribution as the nation’s lender of last resort, having played a significant role in steering the country through two pivotal crises.

King aka the monarch, symbolizes national unity and continuity, offering a sense of stability that transcends party politics. The directly elected Prime Minister, is the sole leader of the Government whose leadership is political. To ensure that the head of the government, the Prime Minister, functions within the spirit of constitution, it is necessary to establish monarch as the head of the state.

Constitutional monarchy is not only about establishing an institution in the country, it is also about setting a new standard of the state. We, GenZ , have experienced multiparty democracy, but we are yet to experience the monarchy. Even today, majority of Nepali, especially the youth are in favor of monarchy. In the context of Nepal’s rich diversity, a constitutional monarchy can serve as a neutral custodian of the constitution, safeguarding cultural identity and traditional heritage. The Royal Family embodies national interests, working diligently to uphold the pride of our nation while fostering stability and protecting the rights of the people. In this framework, the King operates within the parameters set by the Constitution, as the guardian/head of the state. His authority is inherently limited, the sovereignty vested in the Nepali citizens, ensuring that the monarchy contributes positively to the governance and unity of our nation.